2 ms·
>I don't understand how it could be considered just for someone to be punished for making an honest mistake in their testimony. His job is to run the company a
by mrguyorama 3y ago
>I don't understand how it could be considered just for someone to be punished for making an honest mistake in their testimony.
His job is to run the company and take responsibility for it. If he doesn't know something illegal is going on, he is still at fault for not learning about it
- reaperman 3y agoThis flirts with the is/ought fallacy. The way you wrote, it sounds like you’re saying that in our current legal system they can be found “found at fault” in a legal sense. But I believe what you meant is that under a different/hypothetical legal system, one which you believe to be closer to optimal, they should be found at fault.