3 ms·
Without agreeing with the OP, this lengthy quote didn't respond to his statement on confounding factors.
by psychlops 3y ago
Without agreeing with the OP, this lengthy quote didn't respond to his statement on confounding factors.
- belltaco 3y agoThe point is that here's a lot of evidence from before the alleged confounding factor even showed up, so that means there's something there. For example, from Sep 2020. https://www.science.org/content/article/evidence-builds-covid-19-can-damage-heart-doctors-are-racing-understand-it https://www.science.org/content/article/evidence-builds-covi... Several more articles and studies from March and April 2020 if one cares to look them up. So yes, it was definitely responding to their claim.