it had many contributors, but organized through very few reviewers, and in a very organized fashion. It's a good example of reasonably well executed software IM

it had many contributors, but organized through very few reviewers, and in a very organized fashion. It's a good example of reasonably well executed software IMO - nobody pushing code to get promoted or pushing for growth hacks in the codebase. I don't think there's a specific number that makes a software team suddenly "too big", but you can clearly see how different the dynamic is when you're in a team that's too big