3 ms·
Somewhat off topic, but whenever the "Good times create weak men" idiocy comes up I always think of this F. Scott Fitzgerald quote about WWI: > "That’s differe
by AlexandrB 3y ago
Somewhat off topic, but whenever the "Good times create weak men" idiocy comes up I always think of this F. Scott Fitzgerald quote about WWI:
> "That’s different. This western-front business couldn’t be done again, not for a long time. The young men think they could do it but they couldn’t. They could fight the first Marne again but not this. This took religion and years of plenty and tremendous sureties and the exact relation that existed between the classes. The Russians and Italians weren’t any good on this front. You had to have a whole-souled sentimental equipment going back further than you could remember. You had to remember Christmas, and postcards of the Crown Prince and his fiancée, and little cafés in Valence and beer gardens in Unter den Linden and weddings at the mairie, and going to the Derby, and your grandfather’s whiskers."
> “General Grant invented this kind of battle at Petersburg in sixty- five.”
> “No, he didn’t — he just invented mass butchery. This kind of battle was invented by Lewis Carroll and Jules Verne and whoever wrote Undine, and country deacons bowling and marraines in Marseilles and girls seduced in the back lanes of Wurtemburg and Westphalia. Why, this was a love battle — there was a century of middle-class love spent here. This was the last love battle.”
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9044972-see-that-little-stream-we-could-walk-to-it https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9044972-see-that-little-str...
- spir 3y agoThanks, this is great.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Jerry8538 3y agoWhat does this have to do with the "good times create weak men" stuff?
- honkycat 3y agoMaybe you should do some studying to improve your lateral thinking, because it is extremely obvious.
- bardackx 3y agoI didn't get it either, it might not be that obvious, or one might need extra context
- mock-possum 3y agorude.
- eszed 3y agoFitzgerald's thesis in this passage is that the western powers' prosperity in the 1890s and 1910s - and, more broadly, the social capital built by their national identies across the entire 19th century - created a generation "tough" enough to endure their unspeakable mutual slaughter on the western front. If he is correct, then it refutes the proposition that prosperous societies are "soft".
- Ferret7446 3y agoThat quote seems to support the exact opposite of your opinion, that you need a generation properly raised to tough it out, and the spoiled post-war generation is too soft.