You keep bringing up dismantling the police force, but the person you're repsonding to never said that. Argue against their points, not the positions you have i

You keep bringing up dismantling the police force, but the person you're repsonding to never said that. Argue against their points, not the positions you have imagined for them in your head. > Your argument says that we can improve the police, not that the police is net negative. >Net negative means that society would improve if we just removed it without replacing it with anything. Can you defend that? Also, net negative means that their negative actions outweigh their positive actions. I don't know how you got the idea that negative == not repairable. You're putting arguments that they didn't say into their mouth. You're only arguing in false dilemmas.