>It is easier to not change how millions of people travel. Only if you assume we don't have to pull our co2 emissions down drastically in the first place. >If

>It is easier to not change how millions of people travel. Only if you assume we don't have to pull our co2 emissions down drastically in the first place. >If we aren’t doing direct air capture, we’ll still have the air travel. And if we'd account for the effort and cost of the direct air capture to offset it we'd have almost no air traffic and most of would remain would be less practical and fast. We'd have had so so much more runway on this issue if people were willing to go for even just the low hanging fruit. As it stands it appears we and you in particular don't even want to tacle the low hanging fruit wrt this part of the issue and so I presume in general.