3 ms·
I'm sure Markdown isn't perfect, but when you mentioned a "richer document format" I assumed you meant something like MS Word docx or rtf files. If not markdow
by gadders 3y ago
I'm sure Markdown isn't perfect, but when you mentioned a "richer document format" I assumed you meant something like MS Word docx or rtf files.
If not markdown, what would you suggest?
- eviks 3y agoYes, those two would work better for the writers since then they'd be able to WYSIWYG-edit individual documents in other editors while having the potentially better style/content diffability/batch renaming etc in this one (and that would also help avoid the common mistake of having two separate views just because the underlying format is plaintexty) Although personally I hope for a modern rich-text CRDT-based format that would also enable collaboration, but don't know of any specific one in that area
- gilcot 3y ago> If not markdown, what would you suggest? Not as rich as LaTeX but more powerful than Markdown: .rst and .adoc