3 ms·
> "just /.+@.+\.{2,}/ is more than enough" Isn't that asking for 2x '.'s after the @, which isn't required? Should instead be /.+@.+\..+/ Which will allow fo
by swores 3y ago
> "just /.+@.+\.{2,}/ is more than enough"
Isn't that asking for 2x '.'s after the @, which isn't required?
Should instead be /.+@.+\..+/ Which will allow foo@bar.com but not foo@bar ?
- arp242 3y agoEh yeah, I missed a dot there >_< I may be a sad case, but I don't write unit tests for my HN comments.