4 ms·
The same can be said for a snarky “please reread…” instead of directly addressing the comments that you take issue with. And is not the strongest interpretatio
by Tabular-Iceberg 3y ago
The same can be said for a snarky “please reread…” instead of directly addressing the comments that you take issue with.
And is not the strongest interpretation a friendly tongue-in-cheek rather than a cross-examining demand for you to justify your follow-up question? I know some communities like to use the /s convention, but under that principle it seems redundant to me.
- reaperman 3y agoThat was the only part of a comment I took issue with and I did “directly address” it. None of the rest of the comments were part of “an argument” and I took no issue with them; there was nothing else to “address”. Looks like other community members also agreed that you were out of line, judging by the flagged status. It seems that your creative interpretation of the guidelines might need some revision. That includes whether my corrective comment was “snarky” - that comment has received positive karma votes from the community and is not flagged for violating HN commenting guidelines.