4 ms·
Doesn't the server discarding requests with the timestamp beyond a threshold already do windowing but statelessly?
by willvarfar 3y ago
Doesn't the server discarding requests with the timestamp beyond a threshold already do windowing but statelessly?
- tommiegannert 3y agoI responded to this: >> Timestamps can be vulnerable to clock attacks, right? Why not just include a monotonically increasing request number along with the nonce in each request? > That interferes with the ability to send multiple requests in-flight at the same time. I.e. it was assumed there was a sequence number, and I refuted that it disallows concurrent requests. In general, I agree a signed timestamp is fine.