2 ms·
> (...) but the chances of it being incidental is vanishingly small. I think you're misrepresenting OP's claim. OP explicitly stated there's some likelihood th
by rewmie 3y ago
> (...) but the chances of it being incidental is vanishingly small.
I think you're misrepresenting OP's claim. OP explicitly stated there's some likelihood the influence is minor, but for some reason you're trying to refute "incidental", which is not what OP claimed.
- dimal 3y agoI agree with much of what was said. My point was that they didn’t stick the landing. They overshot the mark. They did specifically use the word “incidental” so I don’t see how I could be misrepresenting anything.