4 ms·
It’s extremely unlikely that every Okta Support employee has this level of access, much less on a persistent ongoing basis. It would be nearly impossible to ac
by nixgeek 3y ago
It’s extremely unlikely that every Okta Support employee has this level of access, much less on a persistent ongoing basis.
It would be nearly impossible to achieve this level of compliance certification if it were this simple and this broken.
https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/ https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/
- Veserv 3y agoWhy do you have a link: https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/ https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/ to the list of Okta certifications in your bookmarks? You absolutely did not do a search for it just now because that is a stale link so there is no way you even clicked through that link before pasting it and you already knew what was supposed to be on that page. This is the current link: https://trust.okta.com/compliance/ https://trust.okta.com/compliance/ And anyways, yeah, those certifications are useless box checking garbage that a totally broken system can get. Solarwinds has most of those same certifications: https://www.solarwinds.com/trust-center https://www.solarwinds.com/trust-center and they are a total clown show. In fact, basically all of the clown shows have those because all most of those standards amount to is verifying your paperwork is consistent.
- nixgeek 3y agoI got that back from a search and do not have it in my bookmarks, and I did quickly skim it before pasting as well. You have a creative imagination about how I use the internet though, sorry.
- Veserv 3y agoThe link you posted: https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/ https://www.okta.com/trust-page/compliance/ returns a 404, page not found. There is nothing on that page. I replied to you at most a few hours after you posted that link. Are you going to claim that Okta updated the url in that few hour long window? For that matter, you did not even double check the link after I said it was stale or you would have used that argument in your post since it is the only credible reason to claim a dead link had contents.
- nixgeek 3y agoI guess that’s what happened? I’m honestly not sure why you’re so caremad about this either, your tone is extremely accusatory over something incredibly minor.