3 ms·
Honestly, it seems to me like we are heading back to a world where everything is self-hosted again. You can't keep a giant central target secure.
by Uptrenda 3y ago
Honestly, it seems to me like we are heading back to a world where everything is self-hosted again. You can't keep a giant central target secure.
- flandish 3y agoYeah but self hosted means someone out of laziness will expose a port so they dont have to be home to sync or configure wireguard, etc… and/or since all ips are scanned anyway… Complacency will result in more leaks and less knowledge of them maybe? I reckon “passwords on a notepad in pen and ink” is safer plus passkeys like yubi. If someone breaks into your home you got other concerns..
- rurp 3y agoCompanies don't force their cloud hosting solutions because it's good for users, they do it because they can make more money. Unfortunately I think things will have to get a lot worse before companies have to reverse course on this.
- samcat116 3y agoI actually think if a bunch of companies started hosting their own SSO, we'd hear of a lot more hacks. I'm not sure orgs would put in enough resources to do things properly other than "hey we got keycloak working"
- steve1977 3y agoMaybe SSO as such is not the greatest idea?
- bananapub 3y agorandom IT departments won't do a better job securing IDP than google or microsoft or whatever, self-hosting that stuff will just lead to more, mostly smaller breaches. simultaneously, Okta seems rather bad at their job of not getting hacked and having proper fucking audit logs