3 ms·
It will be a while. There is a large group of people who don’t willingly uses new tools when those tools enable all comers to make better, “competing” work prod
by constantly 3y ago
It will be a while. There is a large group of people who don’t willingly uses new tools when those tools enable all comers to make better, “competing” work product.
That will progress a funeral at a time until the stigma is gone and you have critical masses of people really pushing the art of the possible. Lots of the SAF-AGRA protest is based on this reasoning.
- chabad360 3y agoThe SAG and WGA protest have almost nothing to do with this. The AI debacle their worried about is either being replaced by AI versions of their likeliness (without pay) or being paid less and remaining uncredited because AI was used to write/edit (a portion of) a script, respectively.
- gruez 3y ago>or being paid less and remaining uncredited because AI was used to write/edit (a portion of) a script, respectively. Here are the demands from the WGA: https://www.wga.org/uploadedfiles/members/member_info/contract-2023/WGA_proposals.pdf https://www.wga.org/uploadedfiles/members/member_info/contra... Their proposals were: >Regulate use of artificial intelligence on MBA-covered projects: AI can’t write or rewrite literary material; can’t be used as source material; and MBA-covered material can’t be used to train AI I agree some aspects are about writers protecting themselves from being replaced by AI, but the outright ban on use of them (ie. "can’t write or rewrite literary material") and prohibiting them from being trained seems consistent with the parent's claim of "There is a large group of people who don’t willingly uses new tools when those tools enable all comers to make better, “competing” work product"