2 ms·
> They still experience the same losses with headwind, arguably even more. Which is why having more total energy available in the fuel system is significant an
by akira2501 3y ago
> They still experience the same losses with headwind, arguably even more.
Which is why having more total energy available in the fuel system is significant and means that EVs are not a "drop in" replacement for ICE. Which is what the assumption in these threads seem to be.
> Then don't get a battery-electric vehicle?
Sure.. I'll just move to a state where it's not mandated, then. Why are you going out of your way to pretend that there aren't actual impacts to real people when these decisions get made?
> How you're able to look 25-50 years into the future is beyond me.
Oh.. experience and training. You'll notice I used the word "probably" and invoked "abysmal rate of infrastructure development" as part of an effort to avoid this type of mindless bullying.
Some of us are actually trying to navigate reality successfully without prefect information. It requires reasonable compromises that everyone should be plainly familiar with.