2 ms·

> How do you define "safe"? There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them. > What if different countries have different definitions? Then browser w

> How do you define "safe"? There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them. > What if different countries have different definitions? Then browser will refuse to open pages from that countries. For example, there could be an organization assigning rating to websites and issuing them a cryptographic signature as a proof. The browser will refuse to open any page without this signature, including pages from countries with different standards. > How do you enforce this policy? With jail terms. > At what point is a person allowed to view not "safe" web content? At the age of 18.

l33t7332273 3y ago
>There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them These are provided by a private entity. What we clearly need is an official government morality commission.
johnnyanmac 3y ago
> There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them. much of social media is unrated, and no organization is going to rate every tiktok before releasing it to the wild. Even rated Video Games with online (even as family friendly as Nintendo) have the same "online interactions are not rated", because you cannot predict what activity will happen between two people in real time. >At the age of 18. TV and movie ratings have multiple age gates. 6+, 10+, and 17+ are the most common (and there are all kinds of 12/13/14/16+ ratings). This is exactly why "for kids" is such a asinine binary to base things on. the government doesn't define any age gates, but pretty much every single piece of media that rates content recognizes that a 5 year old is different from a 16 year old. >The browser will refuse to open any page without this signature, including pages from countries with different standards. neat, more region locking. just what everyone wanted. I guess NordVPN is going to campaign hard for this.
- codedokode 3y ago
  > I guess NordVPN is going to campaign hard for this. Nobody in their sane mind will campaign for allowing children to access harmful content.

l33t7332273 3y ago

>There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them These are provided by a private entity. What we clearly need is an official government morality commission.

johnnyanmac 3y ago

> There are ratings for movies and games, we can use them. much of social media is unrated, and no organization is going to rate every tiktok before releasing it to the wild. Even rated Video Games with online (even as family friendly as Nintendo) have the same "online interactions are not rated", because you cannot predict what activity will happen between two people in real time. >At the age of 18. TV and movie ratings have multiple age gates. 6+, 10+, and 17+ are the most common (and there are all kinds of 12/13/14/16+ ratings). This is exactly why "for kids" is such a asinine binary to base things on. the government doesn't define any age gates, but pretty much every single piece of media that rates content recognizes that a 5 year old is different from a 16 year old. >The browser will refuse to open any page without this signature, including pages from countries with different standards. neat, more region locking. just what everyone wanted. I guess NordVPN is going to campaign hard for this.

codedokode 3y ago
> I guess NordVPN is going to campaign hard for this. Nobody in their sane mind will campaign for allowing children to access harmful content.