3 ms·
alway wonder why browsers don't keep at least a text version of the pages for search nowadays I expect browsers to incorporate small LLMs like Mistral out of t
by visarga 3y ago
alway wonder why browsers don't keep at least a text version of the pages for search
nowadays I expect browsers to incorporate small LLMs like Mistral out of the box
- coolvision 3y agoif history search worked better then you would visit google/bing less, so I expect pushback from browser vendors also: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=297648 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=297648
- TeMPOraL 3y agoFrom a comment on that issue page, dating a little over a decade ago: > Shouldn't this be left to users to decide whether they want a feature or not. Yes, those were good times. Nowadays, it's anathema to software vendors, and increasingly even to open source devs.
- totetsu 3y agoAnother advertising revenue win for Query Jerry from marketing.
- poyu 3y agoNot every browser vendor runs a search engine…
- janalsncm 3y agoApple and Mozilla aren’t Google. Apple runs their own searches on the App Store and iPhone, but Google pays them to be default. There’s no reason Apple couldn’t also index your search history in a more meaningful way other than perhaps space requirements.
- patapong 3y agoOpera used to do this! And then when you searched in the top bar, it would also search your visited pages. It was very useful.