3 ms·
They can already do that with ease by instructing the companies that own it to shut it down. I’d argue that having local officials in charge offers more transpa
by xenospn 3y ago
They can already do that with ease by instructing the companies that own it to shut it down. I’d argue that having local officials in charge offers more transparency than a nameless corporation.
- gooseyman 3y agoCleveland has a public owned utility for power that does publish an annual. https://www.cpp.org/About/Annual-Reports https://www.cpp.org/About/Annual-Reports The non-Cleveland owned utility data is also available, it’s just not as “Cleveland specific”
- jpk 3y agoSure, but the company has an incentive to resist such an order. So there's a check there. I guess all I'm saying is there should be a check, and transparency about when that check is tested.