4 ms·
Yeah but this time the tech is based on stealing people's intellectual property. Hopefully this theft ends soon.
by gumballindie 3y ago
Yeah but this time the tech is based on stealing people's intellectual property. Hopefully this theft ends soon.
- thriftwy 3y agoYou cannot expect to be paid the same amount of money by the same size audience when the supply increases dramatically. Recording industry got this lesson 20 years back.
- AlexandrB 3y agoOn the contrary, I think of AI as a form of shrinkflation. Consumers will probably pay roughly the same for inferior content. AI companies will capture the excess profits.
- ramesh31 3y ago>Yeah but this time the tech is based on stealing people's intellectual property. Hopefully this theft ends soon. It isn't necessarily or fundamentally, though. Public data was just the most accessible training corpus for the POC phase of adoption. Getty just released their first licensed model, and I suspect things like that will pick up steam as the tech has rapidly commoditized. That being said we will probably end up with a supreme court ruling on this in the next five years, and I strongly believe it will come down on the side of fair use.
- visarga 3y agoTechnically it is only taking gradients from the training text, not the text itself. And those gradients are all added up so the contribution of any one of them is diluted to almost nothing.
- wilg 3y agoWhat if what you can build based on humanity's collective "intellectual property" is worth the discomfort of not "owning" the work you release into the world?
- gumballindie 3y agoSuppose you could use the argument for robbing everyone of their possessions. I believe communists did that. Imagine if the state built based on humanity’s collective property. Didnt go well did it?
- wilg 3y agoNot a great argument.