3 ms·
Yes, because obviously the only possible options are a state surveillance program to flag up any teaching assistants who criticise any aspect of government poli
by notahacker 3y ago
Yes, because obviously the only possible options are a state surveillance program to flag up any teaching assistants who criticise any aspect of government policy and teaching bureaucracy, or the sort of "free speech absolutism" that concludes that literally nothing a teacher could say could ever render them unsuitable for a teaching job.
No middle ground is possible.
- robertlagrant 3y agoGood to get the sarcastic straw man out of the way, so we can get back to the actual conversation.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- notahacker 3y agoThe "actual conversation" being one based entirely on the highlighted bad faith false equivalence between private citizens exercising their right to object to offensive and discriminatory behaviour and government resources being used to compile lists of people who has expressed doubts about its policy...