I hear ya. Essentially, credentials aren't a good way to measure -- much less guarantee -- quality? That makes sense. I've encountered several doctors, etc. wh

I hear ya. Essentially, credentials aren't a good way to measure -- much less guarantee -- quality? That makes sense. I've encountered several doctors, etc. who weren't very good, including one who shouldn't have been allowed to practice, IMO. Point taken. Anyway, in your experience, what actually WOULD be a good indicator of candidate quality?