3 ms·
AV1 is a massive flop in my opinion. What was supposed to be the be all end all open source video format of the future just recently barely starts to pop up her
by Culonavirus 3y ago
AV1 is a massive flop in my opinion. What was supposed to be the be all end all open source video format of the future just recently barely starts to pop up here and there. There are tech demos and talks of Youtube etc. using AV1, but in the same breath they say it's mostly for really low bitrate where the AV1 gains the most. Also I'm sure no one is looking forward to burn CPU time (or very lately, GPU time) on encoding 4k+ streams. Is that even financially viable? You save 30% on bandwith and spend 10000% more on server HW time. (I'll admit that these numbers are pulled from my ass, but they're based on a few years old knowledge of AV1 encoders being like 350-3500 times slower than h264 encoders, depending on optimization.)
The entire "there was no usable encoder and no hw decoder for years" thing didn't help and even now it's still all slow and complex, who has time and money for that?
AV1 is just too complex for what it produces in comparison with the good old h264 or vp9.
- jeroenhd 3y agoAV1 performs just fine, the problem is that it started gaining popularity at a time that new hardware has exploded in cost, especially for computers. h265 has been in computer hardware for a while, but as I have found out trying to play some special h265 stream on my laptop in the train, software decodes will easily peg the CPU as much as AV1 does. h265 hardware decoding came out in 2015 with Nvidia's 9xx series, while AV1 took until the unaffordable Nvidia 30xx/Intel Xe/RDNA 2 generation to become available. Encoding support took even longer (RDNA3/Xe 2/Arc/40xx). In a few years, I'm sure it'll be as popular a format as h265 is today.