3 ms·
> How many users pick one solution over another because it's quicker? Isn’t that what drives the most sales in upgrading a phone? Idk many people that care abo
by _gabe_ 3y ago
> How many users pick one solution over another because it's quicker?
Isn’t that what drives the most sales in upgrading a phone? Idk many people that care about the microscopic improvements to the camera or UI, most of the time it’s something along the lines of “my iPhone 8 doesn’t run fast enough anymore, time to upgrade”. Same with consoles. I remember one of the big pitches of next gen consoles being “look! No more loading screens!”. And even ChatGPT 3.5 vs ChatGPT 4. There are tons of people that will use crappier output because it’s faster. Speed is still absolutely a selling point, and people do care.
- ajmurmann 3y ago> I remember one of the big pitches of next gen consoles being “look! No more loading screens!”. And even ChatGPT 3.5 vs ChatGPT 4. Those are the very specific use case I mentioned. How many users are gonna swap to a different chat client because of this or a different word processor because it start 1s faster? As a parallel comment points out, even developers swapped away from the very quick Sublime to Atom and now VSCode. At work hiring at some point became a huge pain because we swapped from Greenhouse to the recruiting tools built into Workday. It was super slow. I hated it, our recruiting team hated it, but it was purchased because it checked all the boxes and integrated with all our other stuff in Workday. The comparison to engine efficiency made me think that if we really want faster software, we need the equivalent of a gasoline tax for software, but what's the negative externality we are preventing?