4 ms·
That's scary, now let me add to that. Imagine if he was one of the pilots allowed to carry firearms on the plane. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-4337
by kemiller2002 3y ago
That's scary, now let me add to that. Imagine if he was one of the pilots allowed to carry firearms on the plane.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43377461 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43377461
- aschobel 3y agoHe was commuting to be crew on a 737 flight. No need for a weapon to kill a lot of people when you are at the controls of the plane.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Spooky23 3y agoWhen you’re a passenger in the jump seat, not being able to shoot the pilots made it more difficult to kill said people.
- zzzeek 3y agothe pilot and first officer subdued him. if he had a gun he could have shot them both first and been successful.
- MauranKilom 3y agoThe point being made is that he could've just crashed his next own flight.
- jacquesm 3y agoFrom what I understand these things can happen on the spur of the moment without any logic to it.
- JCharante 3y agoHe's a 737 pilot, he could wait until he's jumpseating on a widebody plane and strike then.
- zzzeek 3y agowe're all assuming this pilot wanted to crash "any" plane. do we know that? what if he were trying to murder someone on this plane ?
- averageRoyalty 3y ago> All this, and not an extra cent in their wages. > "There's not much we can do for them apart from say 'thank you'," says Sarandrea. "We send them a certificate of appreciation every five years. When they retire, we give them a memento." You could... pay them more for the extra risk they take? Very American brain movr, don't pay more for higher risk, and then proudly state it. Patriotism at its finest.