3 ms·
I don’t think anyone thinks this reasonably sets a precedent. The only thing it did precedent wise is reinforce the precedent of not no showing to you’re own d
by lovich 3y ago
I don’t think anyone thinks this reasonably sets a precedent.
The only thing it did precedent wise is reinforce the precedent of not no showing to you’re own defense if you don’t want to have a bad time.
The last paragraph he’s made is just fake news. He likely could have had it easily thrown out if there was any attempt to do so. Based on the articles quote about him telling another agency to shove their fines up their ass the gentleman seems like the kind of individual who thinks the law and government power doesn’t apply to him, and is always incensed to find out it actually does
- aeneasmackenzie 3y agoIs he so incorrect to think Australian (or famously, New Zealand) laws do not apply to him as an American?
- lovich 3y agoI had unfortunately ambiguous pronoun usage there. The “he” in “the paragraph he’s made is just fake news” referred to the author of the telegram post who runs kiwi farms. The other uses of “he” were referring to this Vincent fellow who was the defendant of the case and according to the article, under Australian jurisdiction