3 ms·
I have zero regrets/concerns claiming that the semantic version is 8 × smaller, renders faster, and is easier to modify and extend. Tailwind markup is clearly m
by tipiirai 3y ago
I have zero regrets/concerns claiming that the semantic version is 8 × smaller, renders faster, and is easier to modify and extend. Tailwind markup is clearly more bloated than semantic one. See:
https://nuejs.org/blog/tailwind-vs-semantic-css/img/markup-big.png https://nuejs.org/blog/tailwind-vs-semantic-css/img/markup-b...
There are many developers who agree with this. Luckily not my lonely fight :)
Accessibility (attributes outside "style" and "class") are outside the topic (even though both sites give accessibility score in the same ballpark).
- meiraleal 3y ago> I have zero regrets/concerns claiming that the semantic version is 8 × smaller, renders faster, and is easier to modify and extend. But you are wrong and your claims are misleading :)
- tipiirai 3y agoI'm actually quite relieved. I was expecting much more hate & resistance from the Tailwind community. Showing this to people who prefer the semantic approach obviously gives a whole different reaction.
- meiraleal 3y agoDo you see what I'm saying? You expected hate. You wrote it with the expectation of causing a reaction so you framed it in a way that could cause reactions to promote your framework as all your previous (also polemic) posts. This is against HN guidelines. > Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity.
- tipiirai 3y agoI mean that Tailwind cricitcisim gets heated very easily