3 ms·
Yes, that was strictly on OS X. I would think that Firefox and Safari would be rendering fonts in the same way, but Safari somehow looks better. I last compare
by oddthink 15y ago
Yes, that was strictly on OS X. I would think that Firefox and Safari would be rendering fonts in the same way, but Safari somehow looks better.
I last compared only a few days ago. When I get back home, I can try again and see if I can get more analytic about what the difference is, but, as I said, part of the problem with this kind of aesthetic/design judgement is that I don't have the vocabulary to analyze it.
- dchest 15y agoHere's a screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/eSZfc.png http://i.imgur.com/eSZfc.png The difference is more obvious in Cyrillic text on the bottom -- there's something wrong with hinting in Firefox. And another one: http://i.imgur.com/op1bj.png http://i.imgur.com/op1bj.png