4 ms·
It would have been (and would be) certainly more successful if foreign powers didnt try to disrupt them. But it's only fair I guess. After all, absolute monarch
by derelicta 3y ago
It would have been (and would be) certainly more successful if foreign powers didnt try to disrupt them. But it's only fair I guess. After all, absolute monarchies saught to disrupt newly born republics around them, as to prevent nasty ideas to spread to peasants.
- cscurmudgeon 3y ago> It would have been (and would be) certainly more successful if foreign powers didnt try to disrupt them Ah the same old excuses Why aren't they successful in the US today or USSR previously? Or North Korea or China today? You do realize even China's top companies are not cooperatives.
- derelicta 3y agoEver heard of the alphabet agencies?
- boeingUH60 3y agoWow, I guess the CIA is now disrupting co-ops after getting bored of toppling countries..
- Nasrudith 3y agoThere is no getting around this. If a system of government cannot withstand foreign powers it is flat out a /bad system for a government/, no matter how well it works/could work at a smaller scale or different context. Corporations may work well economically but there is a reason that among all of the desperate reform attempts nobody decided to incorporate an entire nation and make it publicly traded.
- derelicta 3y agoThe Chilean democrcacy disappeared after a US-backed coup. Does that mean democracy is a bad system of government ?