> is (thus) very sensitive to the probability of the prior Standard practice is to test sensitivity of the posterior against various priors. They're often non

> is (thus) very sensitive to the probability of the prior Standard practice is to test sensitivity of the posterior against various priors. They're often non-informative, e.g., `effectSize ~ N(0, wide)`, and the results are quite robust. Here's a typical playbook: http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/43586_2020_1_Author.pdf http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/4358...