>Ugh. It's called brevity. No, brevity is cutting out the unneeded parts. Cutting out the "except" part of someones argument is not it. >No, but you seem to.

>Ugh. It's called brevity. No, brevity is cutting out the unneeded parts. Cutting out the "except" part of someones argument is not it. >No, but you seem to. You want me to poll friends (anecdotes) You also seem to confuse polls with anecdotes. You do know that polls are a valid statistical tool, right? Or that, when the subject is what guys think polls give an immediate representation of the truth on the matter. Do you know of any other way to get closer to what guys think on a subject than asking them? >Insert your whole statement if you want, it's still sexist B.S. Nothing sexist about it --it's an observation about what guys believe. The belief might be sexist, but the observation cannot be as it's not judging the belief as a good or bad thing. As I said, "most men wouldn't even consider a sexual attack by a woman unpleasant except if they found her ugly". Everyone I know seems to agree on it. Assuming you're a guy, is the notion of being sexually assaulted by a beautiful woman unpleasant to you? >It would be awesome if you pointed out where I indicated anything like this. Gee, maybe in the part where we were discussing how you should NOT advertise your GPS position through all those social apps, and you said that you disagree.