5 ms·

Seems like there should be a user replaceable communication module

• quickthrower2 3y ago
  It is a shame there isn’t a nationwide grid of wires it could use to send those few KB of data through.
  • secondcoming 3y ago
    why should a homeowner subsidise a power company by providing free internet connectivity?
    • _joel 3y ago
      I think the OP meant the power cables, what they are monitoring.
    • tomalpha 3y ago
      A sibling comment makes the more relevant point about powerline, but it’s worth considering that whatever the power company has to pay, you the consumer will be paying for in the end. You could make the case (a good one I think) that a homeowner providing connectivity should get a discount to their bill, or that the power company could directly charge for a separate communication channel. That’s kinda saying the same thing in different ways and depending on your point of view they might not feel fair perhaps. But the consumer is paying either way. Edit: “separate communication channel” could include a human meter reader too!
    • quickthrower2 3y ago
      I was talking about the power cables. But wifi would do the trick too, but as you say why should the homeowner subsidize. It is not so much the cost (maybe 1c of connection) but the onus to keep it up at all times and the security concern of letting IoT you can't patch yourself on your network.
  • _joel 3y ago
    Taking powerline ethernet to new levels...
  • xxs 3y ago
    Indeed, passing data from the secondary to the primary of the transformers is actually hard, adding the handling of voltage transient spikes would make it even more expensive. And you need only a handful of bytes per hour (assuming nice reporting per each hour) - real data is likely fewer than 16bytes (id-time-value), adding an iv and block size encryption is all it takes.
  • maliker 3y ago
    There are powerline carrier (PLC) systems that can communicate over the distribution system at about 1-2 baud. They’re getting replaced by mesh RF systems since PLC is quite lossy and the bandwidth is not sufficient for pulling back full timeseries data for planning studies. I’ve heard PLC systems outside the US work quite a bit better since 230V distribution has fewer distribution transformers.
    • rootusrootus 3y ago
      > I’ve heard PLC systems outside the US work quite a bit better since 230V distribution has fewer distribution transformers. That's interesting, why do 230V systems have fewer transformers than the 240V system in North America?
      • maliker 3y ago
        The US systems are 120 V line-to-neutral (ground), whereas the European and lots of other countries are 230 V line-to-neutral. So after going through a distribution transformer, the non-US systems are at a higher voltage, which means you can distribute the power further without large losses. This leads to more neighborhood-level transformers serving dozens of consumers instead of the US practice of using split-phase transformers to serve only 2 consumers at a time.
    • MayeulC 3y ago
      PLC-enabled smart meters ("Linky") are the norm in France. I am pretty sure I also heard multiple times that PLC was used to transmit some data to equipment along high-voltage lines.
    • sanderjd 3y ago
      Yeah, I think PLC is awesome, but it's also just a whole parallel technology stack that has to be maintained and supplied. This is not such a heavy burden because it's mature technology, but it's not nothing. And while cellular and RF technologies in general are useful for many things, PLC is really only useful for this one kind of (lossy, high-latency, low-bandwidth) communication about electrical networks.
• andylynch 3y ago
  The comms module is normally separate from , but attached to, the electricity meter. Not user replaceable though. Slightly surprised (act, not really) that this is happening. Seems to have been dodged in Scotland & the North because cellular coverage there was poor enough they went with a 400mhz network instead.