4 ms·
“Trillions of functions” is a metric that’s hard to know whether to be impressed by or not. I don’t think it’s impossible that my laptop runs “trillions of func
by fnordsensei 3y ago
“Trillions of functions” is a metric that’s hard to know whether to be impressed by or not. I don’t think it’s impossible that my laptop runs “trillions of functions” every day.
But the callers on this platform are likely remote, and therefore it handles I/O as well, etc. Like I said, hard to understand whether it’s impressive or not.
I’ll assume it’s impressive.
- hiddencost 3y agoTBH anyone using "per day" I assume is dishonest. QPS is the standard measure, and per day is just a sly way to multiply by 86400. If you want an average measure then report the average and peak QPS ...
- zmgsabst 3y agoI divided through, assuming sustained rate: 1T/day = 11.575M/s I personally find 11.5M/s a lot more impressive sounding. Though another comment suggests 100k servers — for about 100/s per server. 10ms per request isn’t particularly good or bad; volume is still impressive.