3 ms·
In general working with or on behalf of "the security state" or "security apparatus" isn't considered kosher anymore. I'd wager that probably plays a large rol
by silenced_trope 3y ago
In general working with or on behalf of "the security state" or "security apparatus" isn't considered kosher anymore.
I'd wager that probably plays a large role.
Additionally there's been several leaks of our spies' identities, by foreign countries but also by our own people to get back at others. Consider Valerie Plame [1] who's identity was leaked by the Bush administration folks: Richard Armitage, Karl Rove, and Scooter Libby, apparently to target Valerie's husband. While Libby went to jail, the group still had a receptive journalist in The Washington Post who similarly had no qualms about revealing the identity of a spy, regardless of danger or legality. Actually we tend to treat journalists as a "higher caste" not to be questioned: "Of course a journalist has the right to report on <any|every-thing>!"
I don't think the same environment exists in our country as in the old days where it'd be "safe" or attractive to be a spy.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame
- psunavy03 3y ago> In general working with or on behalf of "the security state" or "security apparatus" isn't considered kosher anymore. Would be best to caveat that with "for the chattering classes." The IC still seems to manage to recruit just fine among that segment of Americans who live in the real world.