It's a classic market failure. But attacking cost is not the way forward. Improving quality is the way forward. There is a level of quality at which 17% GDP wou

It's a classic market failure. But attacking cost is not the way forward. Improving quality is the way forward. There is a level of quality at which 17% GDP would be a bargain. Edit: To be clear, the 17% is more a system footprint than a cost. The number we want is GDP delta with one system versus some other system, irrespective of system size.