4 ms·
> Hospitals can veto any building plans of a hospital near them. This is to “keep the current hospital profitable” wow that is absolutely wild and maybe one th
by katbyte 3y ago
> Hospitals can veto any building plans of a hospital near them. This is to “keep the current hospital profitable”
wow that is absolutely wild and maybe one the most transparent profits over people i've heard of
- supertrope 3y agoIt’s HHS that can do that not the hospital itself. The intent is to avoid oversupplying an area with hospital services. Because individual demand is inelastic and the government directly pays for half of care (Medicare, Medicaid) adding more supply means increased aggregate healthcare spending. Of course existing firms take advantage of this regulatory process to hobble competition. This is an emergent problem of third party payment. Normal supply and demand mechanisms are not at play.
- lettergram 3y agoIt’s not just HHS, it’s typically at the state level where they ask the hospitals — https://reason.com/2020/02/26/these-state-level-health-care-regulations-raise-prices-and-create-shortages-heres-how-to-fix-them/ https://reason.com/2020/02/26/these-state-level-health-care-... I’ve seen first hand hospitals “justify” not letting competitors as local hospitals always give input (they need to pull records). What happens is the hospitals generate projected reports and showing they’d be bankrupt if another hospital is allowed.
- FireBeyond 3y agoCertificates of Need are absolutely not issued without input from current hospitals and facilities in that area. The group responsible for lobbying for them to be introduced in the first place? Hospitals.