3 ms·
> Most modern conceptions of UBI don’t conform to its literal meaning anymore, Michael Mendelson, a fellow with the poverty policy think tank Maytree, told the
by simonsarris 3y ago
> Most modern conceptions of UBI don’t conform to its literal meaning anymore, Michael Mendelson, a fellow with the poverty policy think tank Maytree, told the Star.
> Nowadays, UBI has come to mean any kind of basic income plan, which usually takes the universal form or a “guaranteed” income plan that scales depending on a person’s need.
Step 1: redefine the term?
Looking at the text of the 2021 bill, which you should probably read instead, it uses the term "livable basic income", not UBI. So at least that's more honest. The text is here, it's really very light, closer to an announcement of an announcement than a plan: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/S-233/first-reading https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/S-233/first-...
Is there an updated bill somewhere that has more detail? There were debates this year that you can sorta read here:
https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/441/debates/112db_2023-04-18-e?language=e#67 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/441/debates/112d...
Click "National Framework for a Guaranteed Livable Basic Income Bill"
- fidotron 3y ago"Universal" would be too easy to automatically apply and reduces scope for exercise of bureaucratic power, therefore is unacceptable, as is any idea that such a scheme could possibly replace as opposed to augment existing provisions. UBI or negative income tax to replace the minimum wage and other welfare provisions would be a huge win for Canada, but there are too many people (left/right, federal/provincial etc.) that think they're getting something out of the current situation for it to ever go anywhere.