3 ms·
Incredible that we're so addicted to our phones that they make us get rid of any liquid but we can still carry that firebomb with us into the cabin.
by INTPenis 3y ago
Incredible that we're so addicted to our phones that they make us get rid of any liquid but we can still carry that firebomb with us into the cabin.
- comex 3y agoYou can carry liquid into the cabin, just not through security…
- eastbound 3y agoYou can take an empty plastic bottle of 2L and fill it in with a fountain after security.
- BHSPitMonkey 3y agoYou're restating what the parent commenter said, yes. You can also buy many other kinds of food and drinks after security.
- pjmlp 3y agoYou're allowed to take liquids acquired after security, that are exactly what they are supposed to be, liquids for human consumption. What they don't want is people taking liquids that aren't designed for human consumption. As for the phone battery issue, yeah it is a problem, I guess the only solution would be to forbid any kind of battery powered device. I bet lots of folks won't be happy with such regulation. It would take care of flights for business purposes and increase selling books though.
- Kwpolska 3y agoShampoo isn't designed for human consumption, yet I can take up to 1 L in 100 mL bottles through security. The liquid rules were introduced in 2006 in response to a foiled terrorist plot involving explosives in soft drink bottles. But if you have 1 litre of liquids in small bottles, can't you just combine them to end up with a bomb?
- robjan 3y agoThe 100ml limit is starting to be lifted in some countries that have upgraded their x-ray machines.
- User3456335 3y agoThe point is that 100mL bottles can get scanned better for their contents. It's easier to hide something in a bigger bottle.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 3y agoCan we please stop the "hUmaNitY aDdIctEd to PhOnEs" meme? They're devices that are highly valuable (both monetarily and how much hassle it would be to lose it due to all the 2FA tied to it) and indispensable for modern life. They're not just toys, "addiction machines", entertainment etc. - and even if they were, despite what some puritans think, there is nothing wrong with entertainment if you're sitting in a plane for hours. Prohibiting phones on flights completely would likely be a great way to cut air travel in less than half, because it would become too much hassle to bother with for many. Requiring them to be checked would result in massive theft, and while it would reduce the risk of fire, any fires that would happen would have a much higher risk of being catastrophic. There's a reason why power banks are required to be in the cabin.
- INTPenis 3y agoI have over 40 OTP codes in mine, so I get you. But I can live for one flight without using them.
- robjan 3y agoHow would you get the phone to your destination? Phones are banned in checked luggage.
- INTPenis 3y agoI don't work in this field, why are you asking me? I just thought it was amusing how we're allowed to take these phones, and yes I was making a nod towards people being very addicted to their phones these days. But if I were to speculate, I mean performance shows have yonder bags today. They could be checked in with the rest of luggage in special boxes that you pick up at luggage claim. They're banned in checked luggage, yes, but this would be packed by the airport authority into specialized luggage compartments.
- Const-me 3y ago> highly valuable both monetarily I have never paid more than $250 for a phone, and I hope I never will. > all the 2FA tied to it It’s not the brightest idea to use phone for 2FA, precisely because it’s so easy to break or loose a phone. Fortunately, 2FA algorithms are open and there’re equivalent desktop apps.