> Does he have grounds to sue? This is a good question because “sue” and “convince a jury” are used interchangeably. It is a good thought experiment because if

> Does he have grounds to sue? This is a good question because “sue” and “convince a jury” are used interchangeably. It is a good thought experiment because if we treat the act of filing a lawsuit and the act of winning one as the same thing, this does make the outcome of this trial proof positive of reverse sexism. Some kooks might say “in America you can sue anyone for anything and your chance of winning depends on myriad factors” but that is just a distraction. One woman won one case, so it stands to reason that we must ask if the system is set up so no man can win any case.