The article would be stronger if it stuck to one issue. Is the problem the clean-up, the fact that there's little environmental oversight when exploring, or the

The article would be stronger if it stuck to one issue. Is the problem the clean-up, the fact that there's little environmental oversight when exploring, or the fact that the there should be royalties? They've conflated so many issues and didn't give any specifics. How does exploring negatively affect the environment? What does reclamation look like today rather than the 1800s?