3 ms·

> Unless your friend is required to do the work above their title This is what the OP is implying is happening (I'm not going to rule on fact). Or at the very

by Kamq 3y ago

> Unless your friend is required to do the work above their title This is what the OP is implying is happening (I'm not going to rule on fact). Or at the very least, the person is voluntarily doing work above their title.

endisneigh 3y ago
In either case the friend, the man, still is in the superior position. In the first case they are paid the same as someone with a higher title, and when promoted inevitably they will be paid more than someone with the same title. In the second case they are paid more than people with their same title who may be performing all of the duties required, and this is not to say that there are not others also performing equivalently who did not received this equivalent wage. This sort of situation is exactly why people need to talk to their manager, to avoid over performing and being resentful about it. The fact the person was able to get a raise without a promotion is literally the best case scenario. If their work is actually the same they’ll be promoted and get another raise, resulting in higher pay than those with the same title…
- Kamq 3y ago
  > In the first case they are paid the same as someone with a higher title, and when promoted inevitably they will be paid more than someone with the same title. You act like promotions are automatic, but you're ignoring case where they never get promoted, and can't leverage their resume nearly as effectively because of the lower title. In which case, all they got was a temporary pay bump in exchange for doing extra work, but didn't get any credit for that work.
- jabradoodle 3y ago
  > f their work is actually the same they’ll be promoted and get another raise, resulting in higher pay than those with the same title… The hypothesis is that they are not being promoted because of the demographic they belong to, so that is not a given.

by Kamq 3y ago

endisneigh 3y ago

In either case the friend, the man, still is in the superior position. In the first case they are paid the same as someone with a higher title, and when promoted inevitably they will be paid more than someone with the same title. In the second case they are paid more than people with their same title who may be performing all of the duties required, and this is not to say that there are not others also performing equivalently who did not received this equivalent wage. This sort of situation is exactly why people need to talk to their manager, to avoid over performing and being resentful about it. The fact the person was able to get a raise without a promotion is literally the best case scenario. If their work is actually the same they’ll be promoted and get another raise, resulting in higher pay than those with the same title…

Kamq 3y ago
> In the first case they are paid the same as someone with a higher title, and when promoted inevitably they will be paid more than someone with the same title. You act like promotions are automatic, but you're ignoring case where they never get promoted, and can't leverage their resume nearly as effectively because of the lower title. In which case, all they got was a temporary pay bump in exchange for doing extra work, but didn't get any credit for that work.
jabradoodle 3y ago
> f their work is actually the same they’ll be promoted and get another raise, resulting in higher pay than those with the same title… The hypothesis is that they are not being promoted because of the demographic they belong to, so that is not a given.