2 ms·

Which is not the definition implied by the original quote so great. We agree.

• ben_w 3y ago
  What are you even talking about? This is literally called "boots theory" and is explicitly giving boots as an example. That's what "framing in terms of" means.
  • jncfhnb 3y ago
    If you read the discussion, the quote responded to included the claim > The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Which is a dumb claim. As you’ll note, I said that the general effect was true but this claim was wrong. You appear to be arguing something tangential