3 ms·
Whistlindiesel reliability tested and torched his, and Ferrari didn't do anything.
by latchkey 3y ago
Whistlindiesel reliability tested and torched his, and Ferrari didn't do anything.
- seabird 3y agoWhistlinDiesel has enough money to fight them on it, would fight them on it, and would make money doing it. The dorks at Ferrari that do this lawsuit trolling knew it would probably blow up in their face if they tried anything.
- latchkey 3y agoI dunno, they sued a guy who owns a car dealership for buying a fakerrari.
- seabird 3y agoWhistlinDiesel turns controversy into ad revenue. The ad revenue from such a suit would allow him to remain in court pretty much indefinitely, but Ferrari doesn't have that luxury. He's also the same guy that burned up a Ferrari bombing it through a harvested field, so being "reasonable" (as a lot of people would define it) isn't really his thing. There's no scenario where this doesn't result in a lot of egg on Ferrari's face if they actually went after him for it.
- trollied 3y agoThe video, if anyone is interested. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXi-CV--Wq0&t=3s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXi-CV--Wq0&t=3s
- rasz 3y agoOh, its that idiot. TLDR: Burned two cars down by driving hard to the point of exhausts going red hot and then stopping in a field filled with easily flammable straw. All for clicks.
- kart23 3y agolol it’s his own car… he can do whatever he likes with his property. what would ferrari sue for? it’s not copyright infringement like this case.
- latchkey 3y agoIf you watch his videos he specifically mentions F going after people.