5 ms·
"Bold"? Come on, it's explicitly mentioned in the link whereas you cherry-pick a small paragraph. One director tweeted "F*k Israel every day until the fall of
by mytailorisrich 3y ago
"Bold"? Come on, it's explicitly mentioned in the link whereas you cherry-pick a small paragraph.
One director tweeted "F*k Israel every day until the fall of the zionist regime."
Then some members orgs "rejecting dialogue", "Promotes political warfare strategy against Israel ... with the ultimate goal of dismantling Israel as a Jewish and democratic state."
If you can be so blind I think this proves the point of what very nasty people are easily hiding under the "Pro-Palestine" umbrella. People should be extremely cautious and do their own research. Even the cursory one I've just done here already raises many red flags.
- vector_spaces 3y agoIf you can be so blind ... Note the site guidelines: When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." Mentioning this because I've been frustrated about the lack of attention recent events have been given on this site and I don't want to see this thread nuked
- mytailorisrich 3y agoI didn't call names. Read again what has happened. You seem as blind by the way by refusing to see or acknowledge the sort of people who often hide (or not so hide) their true agenda under the "pro-palestine" umbrella. "Not so hide" because even in this thread I alreary see one commenter siding with what I have called out. So here we have it. So it seems to me that the Guardian is the useful idiot here, if not worse. By the way, I don't think the topic is appropriate on this site, so I have already commented too much but it is also frustrating to see the exploitation by extremists.