> Would a wolf pack stop hunting elk if they could all just sit down and talk with each other? Obviously I could not know (unless such a thing were happening a

> Would a wolf pack stop hunting elk if they could all just sit down and talk with each other? Obviously I could not know (unless such a thing were happening and I were there to observe it, which I am not), so I would try to guess. Maybe temporarily, if you actually have something to discuss (rather than wanting to eat). Even then it would probably be rare even if it is somehow possible. > but meat can reasonably be some percentage of our diet. I prefer a few meals a month that include meat. Yes, I think so too. Of course it need not be all the time (humans is omnivores and should eat both plants and meats), but a few meals in a month, it can be OK. > We've killed so many wolves that it is now on us to either give more land back to wolves, removing our fences and livestock, or kill the deer ourselves. I do think that, you should give more land back to the wolves if they have run out of land (but it is not necessary if that is not the case). Kill the deer yourself is not completely the solution, though, but may be worth if you like to eat a deer. Otherwise, I think that it is generally better not to do and to do something else instead. > There are already animals I will not eat unless it's necessary for survival. Whales. Wolves. Bears. Raptors. Chimpanzees. The list is fairly long. I also, but unless it is because they are endangered, it will not be because of a moral reason; rather, just what I eat is something else instead.