Sorry, but, what? The party not wanting to pay for content and the party wanting to proceed with assassinations are one in the same. And the latter translates i

Sorry, but, what? The party not wanting to pay for content and the party wanting to proceed with assassinations are one in the same. And the latter translates into pressure against the former. So I'm not sure how you think there are two things here that can be taxonomized into independent issues that don't touch each other. Edit in response to the reply: presumably it's the Chinese market that is not interested in paying for content that criticizes them. But if you want to make this about Apple, then I just reiterate that the parties in this case are entangled in ways that can't be coherently taxonomized into independent subjects that are understood as being completely unrelated to each other. If a company bringing shows to market in a country, and the countries willingness to assassinate critics, are subjects you view as unrelated, then, to use your term, our models of the world are probably too different to productively communicate.