3 ms·
paving the way for on-device generative AI seems to indicate that they're not there yet.
by qwertox 3y ago
paving the way for on-device generative AI seems to indicate that they're not there yet.
- troupo 3y agoI wonder if they can get there. Apple did bet on the on-device ML, with varied results. I doubt Google can get around their "we run everything in the cloud" mindset. As an anecdotal data point: they recently silently defaulted storing photos in Google Photos instead of on device (tweet in Russian: https://twitter.com/igrekde/status/1715456025594134690 https://twitter.com/igrekde/status/1715456025594134690)
- jpalawaga 3y agogoogle has tons of on-device ml. live audio transcriptions, for example. always-on shazam. generative ai is very computationally expensive, even for inference. I too wonder if they can get there, but nobody has really done it.
- kortilla 3y agoIs Shazam considered AI? I thought fingerprinting songs was a relatively straight-forward algo that didn’t require any training.
- ShamelessC 3y agoSort of. They were early to use vector databases for semantic search. Now we use embeddings from a neural net as features for semantic search, I think they used lots of labels and analyzed features like beats per minute, chord progression, etc. happy to be corrected of course.
- antifa 3y agoTo me, that choice of words indicates Google is intending to claim the hardware is ready.