4 ms·
What a silly, immature statement. Sounds like the typical reaction I hear to organized retail theft and the rioting and destruction of property back in 2020: "T
by wannacboatmovie 3y ago
What a silly, immature statement. Sounds like the typical reaction I hear to organized retail theft and the rioting and destruction of property back in 2020: "They have insurance."
As if the lack of consequences for perpetrators doesn't have consequences of its own. Insurance is not free money.
- trelane 3y agoI am pretty sure they were responding to the "lack of trust" point raised by the parent, not the crime itself. Their point was that they aren't worried / don't lose trust in the bank if it gets robbed. Rather, the money is guaranteed, so they retain confidence in the bank even if it loses a lot of many due to a particularly successful robbery. Because they'll still get their deposit back. This is 100% what the FDIC and NCUA are about: ensuring continued consumer confidence in their banks.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Libcat99 3y agoThat's not trust in the bank though, that's trust in the system/fdic. I think many would lose trust in their bank if they heard it was being robbed with abnormal regularity.
- kortilla 3y agoRead the fucking thread. I’m responding to banks trying to hide being robbed from their customers. In no way do I condone robbery.