4 ms·
While I agree with you that programmers increasingly relying on LLMs would be (is?) a problem, there is an element of neo-Luddism to this, as was excellently fr
by YoshiRulz 3y ago
While I agree with you that programmers increasingly relying on LLMs would be (is?) a problem, there is an element of neo-Luddism to this, as was excellently framed by xkcd[1] some years ago. Could we not choose to fill all that time we used to spend writing code on testing/verification instead? Or on performance, or documentation, or security? Or, to go back to the premise of the blog, on re-educating ourselves in the tools we use every day but don't actually understand? I don't know how the industry will adapt and I won't bother making predictions, but the future doesn't necessarily involve everyone becoming mindless code monkeys.
[1]: https://xkcd.com/1227 https://xkcd.com/1227
- anonzzzies 3y agoBut I think it will eventually end up in having less understanding of what people are doing, which won’t help us. And I don’t think we will become mindless code monkeys: I think we will end up telling the computer what we need in english but us having 0 clue or memory on how it achieves that. That’s the ultimate ‘too abstract’ issue.