4 ms·
We need a court case arguing anti-drone weapons are covered under the second amendment.
by MSFT_Edging 3y ago
We need a court case arguing anti-drone weapons are covered under the second amendment.
- demondemidi 3y agoWould it kill you to think one move ahead? Policy controlling drone usage is far more effective than arming every wacko with a grudge.
- NovemberWhiskey 3y agoA regular rifle is covered by the 2nd Amendment but you're still going to jail if you shoot at an aircraft with it.
- everforward 3y agoThe issue isn't getting the capability to take down drones, it's getting assurances you won't be imprisoned for doing so. Net cannons are legal to own, and I would imagine directed energy weapons are probably legal to own but not use. Even bird shot in a 12 gauge is probably enough, and I don't think would pose a significant risk when it falls back down.
- justin66 3y agoIt turns out the second amendment doesn’t help you if you use your weapon to commit a crime.