US v Causby is one of the few rulings in this area and it was 83 ft (Causby won) General property rights are 500 ft in uncongested airspace and 1000 ft in cong

US v Causby is one of the few rulings in this area and it was 83 ft (Causby won) General property rights are 500 ft in uncongested airspace and 1000 ft in congested areas, but case law is vague. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Causby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Causby In this particular instance, I would be much more interested if the overflight was legal to maintain compliance in response to the original judicial ruling. They could order 6 inch resolution satellite photos or even better from companies like Maxar and Airbus, too.